Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor-Made

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no consensus on redirect. Singu larity 04:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor-Made[edit]

Non-notable album, no reliable third-party sources, no cover art, no reviews, etc. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless refs can be found to show notability. Edison (talk) 17:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect to Taylormade-adidas as plausible search term. --Smashville^BONK! 18:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect I agree with Smashville... The article has WP:RS issues along with WP:N issues but a logical search process should have to redirect to Taylormade-adidas or if an article was made for Taylor Made Golf... --Pmedema (talk) 18:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect, but to Taylormade, not to Taylormade-adidas. Grutness...wha? 01:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Taylor Horn As the original creator of this article, I say just go ahead and delete it. Doesn't really matter to me. I've already added the original track listing to the Taylor Horn page.Fanficgurl (talk) 12:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.