Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TaxHawk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠PMC(talk) 03:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TaxHawk[edit]

TaxHawk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG and lack reliable sources to verify the content. Couldn't obtain much information about this in Google search index. Abishe (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Logs: 2020-03 ✍️ create
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.