Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tauhfa Ithna Ashari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Puzzledvegetable^{Is it teatime already?} 13:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tauhfa Ithna Ashari[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meeting general notability guidelines with various failed Citations Majun e Baqi (talk) 13:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: The sources aren't great at all, and at minimum I'd support draftifying it at this stage; It doesn't meet WP:STUB. Whether this article should be on Wikipedia at all (ie: is it notable) I'm not so sure that it isn't. Seems to be a fair bit of discussion on Google Books about it. And that's with me being aware of my ignorance and the fact that much of the discussion surrounding it won't be in English. I think it might be notable, but at this stage it shouldn't be in mainspace. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: yes, I'd agree. The book's authorship suggests it might easily be notable, but the article needs better sourcing and drafting before it returns to mainspace. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Impossible for me to tell at this stage whether it’s notable or not. Mccapra (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Redirect: The book is definitely notable, although you may not be able to find much about it in English. Also, it seems there are multiple spellings based on various transliteration renderings e.g. 'Tohfa Isna Ashria', 'Tohfa Isna Ashriya', 'Tohfa-e-Ithna-Asharia', 'Tohfa e Ithna Ashariyya', 'Tohfa Asna Ashria', 'Tohfa-e-Ithna Ashari', etc. There should be effort to expand this article before any talk about deletion, and if it is not, the best is to redirect to it's Author's article.--Fz^tc_s 18:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NBOOK/GNG. No evidence of in-depth reviews in reliable sources. If someone wants to work on this, I am ok with drafitying. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.