Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taufan
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Malinaccier (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Taufan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find WP:SIGCOV sources, and the article fails to meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM criteria. It can be redirected to the director's article, but it needs some reliable source to exist. GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Indonesia. GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I agree the article might depend on one source but that is the least i can find though. Besides, the film clearly meet notability because it was released nationally in 1952 and adapted into a theatrical production in 1958 [1] Dorothy Schnapp (talk) 03:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Dorothy Schnapp: “Because it was released nationally in 1952 and adapted into a theatrical production in 1958” does not really pass any available notability criteria, such as WP:NFILM, also the linked source is a wordpress.com blog, totally unreliable or user generated content. GrabUp - Talk 03:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- It wasn't a WordPress sources, it was an archive of the magazine that was digitized and then put on the blog. U can just cite the magazine Dorothy Schnapp (talk) 05:54, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Dorothy Schnapp I tried to open your provided wordpress link, but it says “Oops! The page was not found.” GrabUp - Talk 12:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- It wasn't a WordPress sources, it was an archive of the magazine that was digitized and then put on the blog. U can just cite the magazine Dorothy Schnapp (talk) 05:54, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Dorothy Schnapp: “Because it was released nationally in 1952 and adapted into a theatrical production in 1958” does not really pass any available notability criteria, such as WP:NFILM, also the linked source is a wordpress.com blog, totally unreliable or user generated content. GrabUp - Talk 03:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I agree the article might depend on one source but that is the least i can find though. Besides, the film clearly meet notability because it was released nationally in 1952 and adapted into a theatrical production in 1958 [1] Dorothy Schnapp (talk) 03:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Ali Joego#Filmography: not opposed to Keep (notable director, notable actors in the cast, sources allowing verification and indicating premise). NB- I could not check the text of the book cited (I am certain it is a valid source, though). -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I don't know Indonesian but those who do, there are Google Book sources.
- [2]
First entered the film as a main player through "Taufan" (1952).
- Best source because three mentions. - [3]
film as assistant director in Taufan ( 1952 )
- [4]
... Taufan ( 1952 )
(assistant director?) DareshMohan (talk) 18:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC) - Weak Keep: The above review seems good and though I can't access the book sources the first seems to be SIGCOV. At the very least, the sources that have already been cited do seem to indicate that there would be additional coverage in offline sources. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 15:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.