Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasmin Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was article speedily deleted (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). JamesBWatson (talk) 20:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tasmin Taylor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:ENT, insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Evil saltine (talk) 05:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I haven't found significant coverage of this model to meet WP:N, or WP:BIO. Them From Space 06:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A7 Not notable, no assertion of significance. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, "signed model and an Ultra Vixen" isn't a claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 16:37, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, no coverage, not a single source. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.