Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Killer Pussies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While the numbers are near equal Keep v Delete, when weighing the quality of arguments on the basis of WP:PAG and analysis of the article in that light, it's not close. That said, I concede that this is not a very strong consensus but after two relists, we are where we are. See also WP:NOTAVOTE. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tasha Killer Pussies[edit]

Tasha Killer Pussies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician! Fails WP:GNG and WP:MBIO!! Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources!!! The editor whose username is Z0 20:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 20:41, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. I seem to have voted "delete" a lot on here in the past few days, and I really don't want to get a reputation as a deletionist, because I don't see myself as that. But honestly, even the most ardent Wikipedia inclusionist would struggle to vote "keep" for this one. One apparent novelty album, one mix on Radio 1 over twenty years ago, and apart from a handful of singles, that appears to be it. Even the Discogs link at the bottom of the article links not to Tasha Killer Pussies discography, as you would expect, but to a compilation album to which Ms Marsden contributes a single track. Kudos to Ms Marsden for getting a Radio 1 Essential Mix slot, but one mix on a national radio station isn't enough to make her notable, especially when over the course of many years the station invited dozens of DJs to contribute mixes. I have no idea whether Ms Marsden still DJs (I kind of hope she does), but I can't even find anything non-notable, never mind notable, that she's done over the last two decades. In a weird way you could even call her a pioneer, as sampling vacuum cleaners precedes the "hoover 'n' horns" tag attached to the music of the hard house scene that emerged a few years later. Richard3120 (talk) 04:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: When I wrote this article, way back when, one of the notablilty guidelines was "has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network" and hence her Essential Mix qualified her for this. This has now been rewritten to "has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network". What counts as substantial? Technohead1980 (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is finding a reliable source for this, something that isn't YouTube or an illegal download website. There's a mention of her in this book as well: [1]. Richard3120 (talk) 16:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm surprised that Radio One themselves don't keep a list of past essential mixes but alas I cannot find one. I assume that a site like this is not reliable enough? http://www.djsets.co.uk/blu-rays/essential-mixes/index.shtml On another note, this page is completely unsourced List of Essential Mix episodes Technohead1980 (talk) 14:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  13:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.