Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tase Matsunaga (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 16:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tase Matsunaga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 27. I abstain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:00, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A Google News Archive search turns up obituaries in 11 different US newspapers in November 1998: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] 98.116.65.131 (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Was named Japan's oldest person by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and featured several times in multiple news outlets. Ryoung122 22:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources provided by 98.116.65.131 (talk · contribs) conclusively establish that Tase Matsunaga is notable per WP:BIO. Cunard (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cunard with admiration for 98.116.65.131 and Aymath, who rescued the article by finding and inserting genuine reliable sources. David in DC (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notability is now asserted beyond any reasonable doubt. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 06:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.