Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarl Warwick (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tarl Warwick[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The last AfD concluded that the subject was not notable as an author (his books are self-published and not reviewed in mainstream publications) or a YouTube personality (no significant coverage in reliable sources). Nothing appears to have changed in that regard.

There is a new claim for notability in that he is (apparently) running for Governor of Vermont, but again I'm not seeing any coverage in reliable sources. We typically set a high bar for unelected candidates for office in terms of the level of coverage. – Joe (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paganism-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The claim of a gubernatorial candidacy has been edited out at the time I'm writing this, but it doesn't matter either way. Mere candidacy is insufficient to claim notability, and there absolutely nothing resembling reliable sources to support his inclusion at this time. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This individual's plan on running as a frivolous candidate in an election does not make him anymore notable than he was when the article was first created. The article only links to the subject's own Wordpress and Twitter accounts. NJM2010 (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the article was more expanded and had better citations I might reconsider as Warwick seems to be a semi-known figure on the some sections of the internet, and he's also an author, but in its current state the article should be deleted. It appears the article was made solely because of his candidacy, but merely being a candidate doesn't mean much. If it he gets significant traction it'll be another story, but it should be deleted for now. 93.107.150.14 (talk) 00:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. After removing all the non reliable sources such as his youtube videos, it is clear there is ot a lot of RS on this individuals to establish notability.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:58, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete still not notable and seeing the talkpage comment this is clear push for publicity . –Ammarpad (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SPEEDY per WP:G11.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.