Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarini Choudhury Govt. Girls H.S. & M.P. School (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No reason given by Nominator, AfD#1 is still ongoing and not closed yet. Consensus below is to speedy Keep. Please share your opinions at ongoing AfD#1 (non-admin closure) DBig Xrayᗙ 05:38, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tarini Choudhury Govt. Girls H.S. & M.P. School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vrisle (talk) 22:53, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close as the first nomination has not been closed yet. Ajf773 (talk) 01:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep under WP:SKCRIT#2, without prejudicing the results of the already-running AfD. The nominator has tried tagging the article for speedy deletion multiple times with multiple (inappropriate) rationales, without success, and is now trying multiple AfD nominations. Whatever its cause, this disruptive behavior wastes community time and attention. Bakazaka (talk) 02:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Here is the problem with the deletion process. An article could be kept 100 times through AfD, and then be deleted on the 101st nomination. What is the true result there? The complementary situation with multiple deletions or even one deletion will rarely be overturned by a single "keep", as it is a far more difficult process – admins tend to frown on an article being recreated quickly after a deletion. The system is faulty because it promotes multiple nominations of the same article by those who prefer deletion. This one just happens to be a little early. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.