Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targumatik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Targumatik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No more sources found than what's already in the article; no notability asserted Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:19, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Calico journal article has 20+ pages about Targumatik. Looks like good source. There may be reviews of this software in Hebrew language magazines (probably printed), but such search is above my capability. Pavlor (talk) 10:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at this article and I don't think it meets notability criteria. The references are skimpy and the short description of the software contains little concrete information or scope for linking to other pages. I support deletion. Bristol Irish (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.