Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taras Movlyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (non-admin closure) AmirŞah 11:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taras Movlyan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His 10 minutes in the third tier of Ukraine might be enough to avoid a PROD but I can't see anything that would allow for a passing of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. The article has 8 references and 4 external links, all of which are database profile pages which SPORTBASIC clearly says are not enough to confer notability. What's more, the database profile pages all duplicate each other and none of them are bringing anything unique to the table. A Ukrainian source search yields nothing better. Best source I can find is PFL which is just his name appearing in a squad list. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Ukraine. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:SPORTCRIT; "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. Meeting this requirement alone does not indicate notability, but it does indicate that there are likely sufficient sources to merit a stand-alone article." So, the fact this footballer played one match in the Ukrainian third level really isn't a sufficient reason to remove a PROD, but I understand that PRODs can be removed for any reason at all so here we are again. This article comprehensively fails the GNG. Jogurney (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - To repeat others, there is no evidence of notability. Anwegmann (talk) 03:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Nom. Fifthapril (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.