Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tar-Aldarion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Númenor#Monarchy. The redirection target can be changed, if so desired. – sgeureka ^t•c 18:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tar-Aldarion

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tar-Aldarion appears in a work that was never completed by Tolkien, and that when published by his son was left in an unfinished state. This is not the stuff notability is made of, there is zero reason to have a stand alone article on him, and the sourcing per se is all primary, with the external links neither being the type of secondary scholarly works we need to establish the notability of a fictional element. John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Unfinished Tales#Part Two: The Second Age Tar-Aldarion has not been meaningfully discussed by scholars or journalists. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 18:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: completely non-notable.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:34, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Numenor#Monarchy, where the figure is referenced as the sixth king of Numenor. Only mentions in reliable secondary sources I can find are in passing, so Tar-Aldarion does not warrant his own article. Hog Farm (talk) 21:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect looks fine for Numenor#Monarchy, it barely exists even within the Tolkien Legendarium, hard to believe this minutiae has existed for sixteen years. ValarianB (talk) 15:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect - Fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.