Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap4Fun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 18:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tap4Fun[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough to meet WP:CORP. Ninjaediator (talk) 21:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:52, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator Ninjaediator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. However, the nomination has some merit so I will leave this debate open. MER-C 18:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is a game, nothing major about that, nothing to seperate it from millions of other such games. Fails GNG. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 10:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MistyGraceWhite, while I agree with you it should be deleted, it's not a game, Tap4Fun is a developer, not a game. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 06:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine brings up very little results. Does not meet WP:GNG / WP:NCORP. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 06:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage; WP:VG/SE (as already mentioned Soetermans above) brings up only a few short news articles about one or another Tap4Fun game, which is insufficient per WP:GNG. IceWelder [✉] 16:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.