Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Harrison (soccer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural keep. Although there is some consensus to delete, there being no keep votes because either individual is notable, I think separate nominations would be the best course of action as the two individuals are only tangentially related. This close does not preclude immediate and separate renomination should an editor wish to. Fenix down (talk) 14:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Harrison (soccer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soccer player who played 9 games in an amateur competition, so does not meet any Wikipedia inclusion guideline. Geschichte (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination also concerns Rochelle Kuhar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Geschichte (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 16:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the same reason I already gave at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Fimmano. Her league is the top league in her country. Insisting that only a "fully professional" league should count, whatever that is supposed to mean, imposes a biased double standard in which nothing a women does is considered good enough, while men are still considered notable by playing only one professional game. That standard is bigoted and wrong. We should either keep this article as someone who reached the highest available pinnacle of her sport, or get rid of NSPORT and consider all athletes properly under GNG on an individual basis, not starting by nominating only womens-league athletes. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Split them up into 2 AFDs. Thanks. Hmlarson (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep - both of them should go through AfD as there is a valid GNG concern. I agree with Hmlarson that we should AfD them separately as both have individual merits. Spiderone 17:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 21:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep Split into two AfD's so we can analyze them separately. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 20:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both as they fail GNG and NFOOTBALL. Dougal18 (talk) 16:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.