Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner Mayes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:56, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tanner Mayes[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. The award listed, "Best New Starlet of the Year (People's Choice)", is not significant. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing even close to notability. We have a clear overabundance of articles on pornographic performers. I know I will get attacked for saying it, but it is true. Any reasonable criteria that required as much reliable source coverage of them as require of most people would cutr this category in half.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Definate lack of RS for a BLP, and no notability. Curdle (talk) 07:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - If only we could keep on looks!, Anyway unfortunately no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets of WP:PORNBIO. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 19:57, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. XBIZ fan awards str neither well-known nor significant. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 23:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.