Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tani E. Barlow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tani E. Barlow

non-notable. Nekohakase 22:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. SkipSmith 22:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is not my area, so please argue me down if necessary, but Barlow is a full professor at a reputable university, the founding editor of an award-winning academic journal, past director of a major project, and has written/edited several reputably published books and many papers/book chapters. This link (from the University of Washington) asserts her importance: [1]. 'Tani E Barlow' gets 9,660 Google hits, of which at least the first few pages seem to refer predominantly to this person. Please provide a specific rationale for deleting the article. Espresso Addict 00:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. More information on her accomplishments can be found at http://faculty.washington.edu/barlow/cv.htm --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I've looked at her CV. This isn't my nomination, but she doesn't seem any more notable than the average professor of her seniority. SkipSmith 06:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That's what I thought when I looked at it. Nekohakase 06:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If she is notable, please prove it. There is nothing in the article but ambiguous claims with no evidence presented to back it up. Nekohakase 06:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per WP:PROF. Full prof, but nothing special. Leibniz 10:35, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like a respected senior academic, but not more notable than the average professor. Fan-1967 21:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Her work appears to be widely cited and reviewed see [2]. Galenet includes her in its list of Contemporary Authors Online. Nearly 1000 results in Google Scholar [3]. Notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 03:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. as per Capitalistroadster. --Buridan 23:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.