Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tandem: Bike Cops

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tandem: Bike Cops[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MOVIE Mo ainm~Talk 01:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any independent reliable sources. —teb728 t c 06:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. The SPA note on the talk page indicates this is a WP:SELFPROMOTION vanity item. MarnetteD|Talk 19:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon MarnetteD, there is/was no SPA note on the author's talk page (yet). And while it is quite possible that noob user Richiem525 is the same person as actor Richie Montuori, I just checked the film talk page and his own and no where does he say or admit to it being vanity or self promotion. The contributor simply states it is "in talks for production with Comedy Central. The show is an actual thing with an actual paid cast." We might think from his 21-edit history that he is a WP:SPA... until he decides to edit other topics. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The note I was referring to is the one on the article talk page and I read it as someone who is involved with the creation of the show as well as the article and that falls within the guidelines regarding selfpromotion. You are certainly free to disagree with that. OTOH The editor certainly passes the Wikipedia:Single-purpose account#General test as did the one the last time this came up. If they edit something other than this article then I will be happy to strike the SPA comment. MarnetteD|Talk 02:06, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

actor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

production:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

predictive:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per being TOO SOON and lacking any coverage in reliable sources. Allow undeltion if this ever changes. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.