Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamil Nadu Government's Public Sector Undertaking
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tamil Nadu Government's Public Sector Undertaking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced original research. Very difficult to verify due to vague article title; not clear if this is a current event (in which case probably not notable) or historical (in which case, when?) Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 13:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete List not notable per WP:LISTN. Also lacking inclusion criteria. --Muhandes (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete List cannot be suitably verified thus fails WP:V OrenBochman (talk) 19:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per above.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is essentially a subset of what's discussed at Public-sector undertaking#India where the shareholder is the Government of Tamil Nadu. It shouldn't be difficult to reference (I'll go about it later) and it's got pretty clear inclusion criteria, although the title needs some tweaking. —SpacemanSpiff 08:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Verifiable list.Many entries have their own pages. The title may be revised.Shyamsunder (talk) 20:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not so notable list of not so notable topic and articles (most of them red links). There are no WP:RS. It fails WP:GNG and WP:LISTN. →TSU tp* 10:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.