Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Černá

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tamara Černá

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe she meets WP:NARTIST. I didn't find anything significant about her on a search, and the cz.wiki has worse sourcing than ours does, so all we have to evaluate is what's in the article, and it's not sufficient for a GNG/NARTIST pass:

ND Magazine profiles are submitted by the artists (see [1], top left, "Sign up to be included on this list"), so are not independent
A listing for the Swan Lake performance on the theater's website, not independent coverage of her
Bare-bones bio of her from a workplace, not independent
Bio from her workplace, reliable for facts but not independent so can't support a claim of notability
Even the archived non-paywalled version ([2]) shows that this article is just a large quote from her
I'm not able to access this almanac, but even if it is significant coverage of her, it's only one source and we can't maintain an article on that basis. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.