Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take on You

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Take on You

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very minor board game company. No interwikis, no sources. They exist but do not appear to be notable. I prodded this with "the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. ". It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with a boilerplate edit summary that did nothing to address any of the issues raised. At best, I can suggest the ATD SOFTDELETE solution of redirecting this to Tannhäuser (board game), but since the prod was challenged, we now need to go through a full AfD set of motions... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, merge (a very little bit) to Tannhäuser (board game). Hobit (talk) 15:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I am not seeing how this publisher is notable. Surprises me that the article had no edits between 2013-2021 too. I also do not think the suggested merger/redirect, especially one to Tannhäuser (board game) is appropriate, not least because this is about a game specifically and should not house content about its publisher. This article title is fairly ambiguous anyway that I don't feel there is any benefit in doing so. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Bungle. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 15:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.