Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TaiKo Supermarket
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- TaiKo Supermarket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable; doesn't appear to meet guidelines of WP:COMPANY PKT(alk) 02:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsourced, doesn't even attempt to claim notability beyond the bounds of the specific neighbourhood it's located in, and is treading rather close to {{advert}} territory, to boot (address, phone number, product listing, etc.) As well, I had a hunch about who might have created the article in the first place, and followed the article history to discover that I was right — this is a user who once created an article about the weekly shuttle bus service from one specific suburban-Toronto seniors' home to the nearest Asian grocery market. And that wasn't even this Asian grocery market, either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per Joe Chill - no significant coverage, doesn't pass WP:N DigitalC (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.