Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahleah Mulder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tahleah Mulder

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability; fails WP:SPORTBASIC #5 due to lack of in-depth sourcing. –dlthewave ☎ 14:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, and Football. –dlthewave ☎ 14:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep coverage in The West, Rookie Me and Code is enough to satisfy GNG. – Teratix ₵ 07:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources in the article are enough to pass the GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 09:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the reasons stated above. If the page is considered not notable for the time being, I would recommend draftifying. She has just been selected as a top draft and will likely have many more sources discussing her in the future. Significa liberdade (talk) 23:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.