Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Imin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Alex Shih ^Talk 12:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tahir Imin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Coverage in independent reliable sources not found. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. It's also worth noting a possible Conflict of Interest, as before I removed some language from the article quite a bit was written in the first person (see here for example [1]). The article has the additional problem of some references being in Uyghur, and I'm not sure that a single currently active Wikipedian with knowledge of WP:RS reads Uyghur. Certainly I've been unable to find one so far. Alephb (talk) 08:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Typical. They would post an article just about anyone who has got arrested in China. Does not pass WP:GNG. STSC (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Intro states that he is "an activist, reformist, public scholar, and journalist", yet the main body does not give any sourced examples to support these four potentially notable occupations. As it fails to provide examples of notable activity, it thereby fails WP:BIO. Loopy30 (talk) 19:43, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.