Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagoo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tagoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from this, there's not much that suggests this passes WP:NWEB. DrStrauss talk 12:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 13:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 13:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:31, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Well it did exist, per Ars Technica and Wired, both linked to in the ELs. But it does look like it was a blip on the radar that got passing attention because of the larger public debate about piracy. Seems it was too soon when the article was created, and it never got soon enough, even almost ten years later. GMGtalk 15:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.