Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagged (website)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 16:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged (website)[edit]
- Tagged (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No evidence of notability. The creator may have some very minor notability with other things he's worked on, but no evidence has been provided that this website is notable. Crossmr 22:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per above; no notability.GalacticExplorer 22:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Do Not Delete Website becoming a public menace. Accurate info like this very useful - as you can see the article is not shameless self promotion so much as a concerned Wiki member giving a PSA. Kiangshi 02:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOT wikipedia is not a soapbox. Your opinion on whether or not its a public menace is original research. Wikipedia isn't a proper venue for public service announcements.--Crossmr 04:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom & WP:NOT; notability not established by the article EyeSereneTALK 15:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - pov/or with "notorious", no refs or even an attempt to demonstrate note. MrZaiustalk 21:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 21:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.