Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tadasana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 11:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tadasana[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic for this article does not appear to be encyclopedic in nature. The article appears to belong more to a dictionary or manual. Rioscopy (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain This article has been nominated for deletion before. If this article is to be deleted, the rest need to be as well.Curb Chain (talk) 19:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG. See article for coverage, reliable, sources. 379,000 Google hits Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable and sourced, might need improvements though Gmkeros (talk) 15:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 11:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Regarding Curb Chain's comment, that AfD was for Tulasana, different than Tadasana. J04n(talk page) 11:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, all the asana articles were nominated.Curb Chain (talk) 01:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Looks like it passes WP:GNG Transcendence (talk) 22:49, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.