Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactical media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 15:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tactical media[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TNT. I don't even know where to begin. It's peppered with legitimate sounding sources but it's packed to the brim with utter junk spammy sites. Graywalls (talk) 05:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this neologism does not meet our guidelines for having an article on such.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and perhaps stubbify per WP:NOTESSAY. Notable topic: see the Scholar result. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 17:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I just start-ified it, which gave the reliable refs some space to breathe. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it isn't really a neologism, but it has been well covered. Notability probably more clear with in-line references, but there are more in addition to the ones already present. StarM 16:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a thing, but we can do better than this while culture jamming consists of a response to the dominant practices within it, tactical media uses the dominant practices in order to penetrate it and become part of it to explain the difference between culture jamming and tactical media. Vexations (talk) 12:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Tactical media is a well-known practice in the media art world; It's a thing. Google books returns enough sources discussing it, as well as a book by the same name, that it is an easy keep. We just need someone to clean up the article.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.