Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taco & Paco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taco & Paco[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Article has not been sourced since its creation. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 01:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If the article was created while after they were initially blocked, this could go speedy. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and this could've been G5 material but considering there have still been other users, even though none of them substantial contributions, AfD will at least have G4 benefits. There's nothing to suggest even minimally better yet. SwisterTwister talk 21:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG according to what's available on the search engines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.