Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TUNES (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Punkmorten 15:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TUNES[edit]

Hardly notable inactive programming project (2003) [1]. Old 2004 AFD apparently on Talk:TUNES. -- Omniplex 23:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, Delete. Lewispb 23:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-06-22 08:03Z
Weak Keep It's an interesting subject, if the article was expanded it could become very informative. --Mincetro 12:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfulfilled crystal ball and just too short to be informative. - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I think, it is fairly non-notable but I cant be sure. The description and website don't really give much clue as to what it is all about (apart from reams of obfustication) so unless someone can come in and rewrite it adding a full description / explanation in leymans terms then I suppose it has to go :D -- Tmorton166 (Errant Emote)^talk 14:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could have been notable (if I could figure out what it was supposed to be) but, per the linked page, there's been no activity in years. Fan1967 15:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.