Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TLC Legacy: Volume Two

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TLC Legacy: Volume Two[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Putting article up for deletion due to lack of sources and articles about it online. I suspect a false article. MaJic (comments go here) 19:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Google searching only returns WP as source. WP:CRYSTAL violation as release hasn't happened, yet. Eddie.willers (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything about an upcoming compilation set for TLC under any sort of name, let alone under TLC Legacy. I'm also a little skeptical about the fact that we have an album cover uploaded onto Wikipedia but there's not even a whisper of a rumor anywhere. I'm thinking that this is something fan created, to be honest.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Delete per above. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 13:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I share the concerns about this subject's legitimacy (WP:HOAX?); I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources - so it does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Gongshow ^Talk 02:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.