Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIDE Editor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as A3 by Dabomb87. NAC. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 01:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TIDE Editor[edit]
- TIDE Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable project, Google test only shows posts by project's members advertising the project, no reviews or significant (or any) media coverage, the article amounts to little more than an advertisement for the project — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 13:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable and the article doesn't even claim any notability. We really should have a CSD for completely NN software. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:44, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The article creator just moved the article into his user-page. I think this closes the discussion, although the left-overs should be cleaned up properly (there's still a Talk-page, etc.) --DanielPharos (talk) 20:44, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy close it's been moved and the accidentally left redirect was speedied (which I probably did wrong). Maybe the talk page should move with the article? Otherwise I think we're done here. Hobit (talk) 00:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.