Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIDEL Park Coimbatore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 05:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TIDEL Park Coimbatore[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion under WP: NOTDIRECTORY. The article consists almost entirely of a list of companies that have offices in the complex. The only source about the complex I could find was this, which isn't nearly enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, neither notable nor written as an article. I can do stuff! (talk) 03:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Draftify, update and submit it for review. Charlie (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Draftify or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per NOTDIR. Draftify might not be a good option since the IT park per se in not notable and I couldn't find any sources with SIGCOV for the park itself. In future, if any notability arises, a draft can be created, but no point in keeping a directory entry of the buildings present in the IT park now, most of which are just uncited non notable OR or random entries. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.