Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TEMPUS theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:57, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
TEMPUS theory[edit]
Non-notable, looks like a copyvio too. WB 01:53, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an essay by a guy who's page has also been listed for deletion. Reads like nonsense though it might actually contain some information. I don't think it's much of a theory, more of a principle of a certain group with a website [1]. freshgavinTALK 02:43, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, original research. Tempshill 03:44, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Text is a copyvio from the Tempus foundation site and they assert copyright. [[2]] --JJay 03:59, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep! We need more crackpot original research under the precedents set by Jamal Udeen Al-Harith, Sami Al Laithi and Abdul Razeq Joaquin Murietta 08:18, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. — JIP | Talk 09:02, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR, if this survives copyvio. MCB 21:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyvio from [3] and linked pages. Tagged and bagged. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "TEMPUS Theory" gets 113 hits on Google, including the TEMPUS Foundation, Hodie Multimedia Publishing, which I suspect is linked to the Foundation, and this mirror of the Wiki article [4]. Some of the links are for uses of "Tempus Theory" in Linguistics, Sociology, and Economics, so I would say the subject is not particularly notable. - Dalbury 00:07, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.