Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAROM Flight 3107

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TAROM Flight 3107

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable accident. A write off but at most it deserves a mention in airline and airport articles. WP:NOTNEWS applies. ...William 13:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William 13:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. ...William 13:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William 13:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The accident is notable because it was caused by an external cause, it had been covered by media, the plane was written-off, it was a scheduled flight. Not every day planes struck an obstacle on the runway causing them to overrun it and end up as scrap. (Gabinho^>:) 13:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Delete as not notable for a stand-alone article, may be worth a mention in related list articles. MilborneOne (talk) 19:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:34, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, passes GNG, airframe was written off. Cause is sufficiently rare enough to add weight to the case for keepig. Mjroots (talk) 14:11, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Also please note that the article includes two sources from non-airline-industry mass media sources — the Ziare.com story (in Romanian) reporting comments by the pilot, and also a story from the South African news source News24 (which I added myself just now). — Rich wales 01:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG, multiple sources indicating notability of the incident/accident... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.