Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAPCO (mail order company)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TAPCO (mail order company)[edit]

TAPCO (mail order company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Articles of this vintage deserve discussion in my view. I agree with the PROD reason: "No evidence it meets N:ORG. Redirect to Remington Arms isn't helpful to the reader as it isn't mentioned, and a mention wouldn't be DUE" given by Star Mississippi but not that mechanism. I obviously invite them to comment here should they wish. I have copied and pasted the PROD here. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Firearms, and United States of America. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • PRODder comment/delete (since I'm not sure how best to format this input given the conversion of my PROD): thanks Timtrent for saving me the step of the nomination. No issue with your contesting the PROD either, of course. My research found lots of forums discussing TAPCO's parts and what had happened to the company, but nothing even approaching N:ORG as it was a small company that appeared to deal mostly in B2B sales. It was active recently enough that coverage in trade publications should be accessible online, but a BEFORE found none. Should the relaunch come to fruition, an article could be created. I don't think draft space is viable as it hasn't launched and is therefore likely more than six months from notability. Star Mississippi 17:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.