Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. G. Baynes Solicitors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 22:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

T. G. Baynes Solicitors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in 2007 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T G Baynes (G4 declined due to the age of the AFD). Having searched, it does appear that the firm is no more notable now than they were then, I can still only find directory-type sources. Most of the content has been removed due to a copyvio but can be seen here. January (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources, and nothing on their website that suggests to me that they meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) or Wikipedia:Notability. Notable cases do not make the firm notable, since notability is not inherited.--Beloved Freak 16:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing notable on Google and Yahoo aside from business listings.SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Likewise I have had a good look for sources and found none that would enable this firm to meet WP:ORG. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.