Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syngap Research Fund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Syngap Research Fund

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article on non-notable organization, almost all the content does not belong in an encyclopedia but on their web site. A list of grants made is not encyclopedia content. A list of partner organizations (most of them non-notable ) with no accompanying information aboutthe partnerships, is not encyclopedic content. And almost none of the references are third party. They are either a publication of a supported researcher, or a mere news item about the organization. Shouldn ever have been accepted from Draf. DGG ( talk ) 06:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. -Hatchens (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.