Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symptomat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 05:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Symptomat[edit]
- Symptomat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I wasn't able to find any notable references to this. The homepage (www.symptomat.com) registers as an attack page (i.e. taken over by malware). But the main thing is, I can't find any evidence of notability. KarlB (talk) 06:57, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverified, not even sure it exists. No sources provided except the above mentioned "malware" site which I chose not to look at. Google News and Google Scholar find nothing, only sentences containing the two words "...symptom at..." Article basically unimproved since 2006, when it was created by an WP:SPA whose sole post in 6 years was to create this article. --MelanieN (talk) 00:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- comment I did go to the malwave site (which I don't recommend), and there is some piece of software there, but I didn't play with it much, and am not clear on its utility. --KarlB (talk) 00:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (2x ec) The program did apparently exist, though the only proof would seem to be through this interview [1] with it's creator. There is no notability as I cannot find anything about it anywhere except self published articles and the two dodgy websites. Chaosdruid (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC) (Note: I moved this comment so it would be in chronological order. --MelanieN (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC))[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.