Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvia Etienne
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sylvia Etienne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only claim to notability in the article is as the founder of the website Ta Noutri. This website no longer exists (apparently, since 2010; the domain is now occupied by a squatter) and that Wikipedia article is also subject of an AfD. I have been unable to find notability for either the website or Ms Etienne. The only sources given in the article are dead links to her own defunct website; the Czech version of the page has exactly the same dead sources. Dricherby (talk) 16:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: the Czech version of the page seems to be just a straight translation of the English one (or vice-versa). It also appears to have been nominated for deletion, by a process that means it can be deleted after a certain date if no reliable sources have been provided. Note that the deletion of the Czech version is not a reason per se for deleting the English version and I am not proposing it as such. Dricherby (talk) 17:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete References were to now-dead own site; aside from Wikipedia copes, no 3rd party refs found. AllyD (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No assertion of notability, let alone adequate sourcing. Jclemens (talk) 06:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per AllyD. I could not locate any periodical articles about the subject. Bearian (talk) 19:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the Czech author of original article says the group/miss Etienne are no longer active. No sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:50, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Sylvi stopped her activities. All mentioned sources are outdated or not available and new references (due to stopped activities) does not exist. There is nothing more to be added to the article... neither the info and neither the references. The-first-author-of-the-article 21:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.