Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Muhammad Kafeel Bukhari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Syed Muhammad Kafeel Bukhari[edit]
- Syed Muhammad Kafeel Bukhari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not-notable. No GNews hits. No GBooks hits. GHits consist of social media and the like. The 2 refs show only a trivial mentions (once each). Declined speedy. GregJackP Boomer! 11:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:07, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't have contested a PROD, but there's too clear an assertion of notability for A7. He is claimed to be "a leader of Majlis-e-Ahrar-ul-Islam" and the current refs do mention him speaking at rallies. Are there perhaps foreign-language refs where he does receive notable coverage? Hopefully the Islam and Pakistan deletion discussion projects will shed some light. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete appears to be non-notable per WP:BIO. As mentioned above, this subject finds only passing mention in a few news items. --SMS Talk 12:57, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete aside from facebook and youtube, no sources in google news or google books with someone of this name. 18:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalHamton (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.