Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Haider Hussain Rizvi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted under criterion G11. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Haider Hussain Rizvi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography fails GNG; PRIMARY sources only provided, a secondary search for further sources by nominator finds none. DarjeelingTea (talk) 11:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom. Article seems to be an autobiography and so violates Conflict of Interest policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiten Dhandha (talk • contribs) 12:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:41, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom. I'm not sure the removals of the speedy tag were allowed but let's deal with it here. Now someone has come along and started vandalizing the article with disparaging and ridiculous comments, and I find myself utterly unmoved to correct it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to speedy it, Shawn in Montreal, but there was just too much going on with the triple tag removals and multiple socks, etc. I figured, at the end of the day, just AFD'ing it would get the same result without all the reverts. DarjeelingTea (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom and Shawn. Total promo and no credible claim of significance. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Tagged for speedy deletion - I can't see the point in puttung this through a whole AfD, speedy is supposed to be to stop AfD backlogs. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 18:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.