Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Viengluang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Viengluang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO Domdeparis (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 02:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 02:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep two of the cited article are about her and her role in the series. Meets the general notabiloty guideline per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to pop culture and galore? If so they are both WP:INTERVIEWs and as such are considered as primary sources for notability purposes. GNG requires in depth coverage in multiple secondary sources. Dom from Paris (talk) 07:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails the first requirement of [for actors], "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." She has only had a major role in one television show. Not notable. Cait.123 (talk) 08:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

She does pass that guideline. She has a major role in multiple seasons of a hit television series. She also meets the secons criteria of having a following. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 14:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing any real WP:RS to establish WP:N. Most of the sources in the article are blogs or social media. The Fine Magazine item is an interview. Science Fiction is just a passing mention. Galore is another interview. These are not what we're looking for in the way of sourcing. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.