Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Underground Film Festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Existent coverage is not sufficient to meet GNG, as outlined by the delete votes. → Call me Hahc21 04:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Underground Film Festival[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created 88 months ago by Sydneyunderground. How come no-one has added any indication of notability? I could A7 this if I wanted to as an unremarkable organised event. Laun chba ller 21:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Coverage is sparse, but not non-existent. Covered in the Sydney Morning Herald. A film screening at the festival was reviewed by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Festival has received coverage from the Special Broadcasting Service. Also covered by The Guardian. -- Whpq (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect. Agree w/nom. The non-local coverage that exists isn't substantial enough IMHO to meet GNG. Epeefleche (talk) 23:08, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete as an annual event you would expect it to create significant coverage but all it gets is occasional mentions. LibStar (talk) 10:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.