Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swimming Pool 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swimming Pool 2[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILMS. The only evidence that this film even existed is an IMDB listing, a few YouTube trailers, and two very brief mentions on Italian film review sites. In no way notable. DES ^(talk) 15:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh all the "sources" I could find are listed on Talk:Swimming Pool 2. DES ^(talk) 17:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 15:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - even if it wasn't a hoax, there's no way it warrants an article - David Gerard (talk) 16:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per DES; moreover, the plot in the external links differ a lot from the plot given in the article. I believe Wikipedia is better off without this article. Best regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage in reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 02:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.