Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiftcover (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to AXA UK. (non-admin closure) ansh666 23:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Swiftcover[edit]

Swiftcover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Certainly questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was simply not convincingly better here, here and here and considering there a few news sources in the article such The Independent, there may be more but it's not convincingly better again. With its current state, it can even be considered speedy and PROD material but given its age and history, AfD again may be better. Pinging past AfD commenters Stifle, NickelShoe, Master Jay and Mailer diablo, past users JzG, Closedmouth, MER-C, X! and Postdlf. SwisterTwister talk 22:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 20:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge as per Stifle - not enough to keep a standalone article, but enough to warrant merging with the parent company. Onel5969 TT me 18:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.