Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swift OS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Swift OS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PROD. Lacks independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not for promotion WP:SOAP. Msnicki (talk) 17:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted due to the fact that it is a real product, and the things in the Article are true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.225.89 (talk) 17:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Msnicki (talk) 17:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Msnicki (talk) 17:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should not be deleted due to the fact that a download link has been posted on the Website so, people can now verify this information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beanlovin2 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no significant coverage in reliable sources. Beanlovin2, I see that you are basically a single purpose account, my suggestion if this is deleted would be to request that the page be userfied in your account space for further work if you believe that eventually reliable sources can be found. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the page then, I found this page certainly intresting because it provided me with knowledge of products that were coming out soon, Ill just request the page to be created by someone else, because i really need this page for my School Project — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.225.89 (talk) 10:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy to User:Beanlovin2, then delete. The criteria for having an article in Wikipedia involve establishing notability via significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. See WP:Notability for details. That simply isn't the case here. This is a very interesting-looking project, but until/unless it gets covered in computing journals or newsletters, the rules demand that it cannot be included in Wikipedia. If this topic might become sufficiently notable in the future, it could be "userfied" (moved into a subpage of your own user page), where you can continue to work on it; see WP:Userfication for a description of what this means and how it works. Richwales (talk · contribs) 02:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although it's an interesting product. It is not yet a notable product and as such does not meet WP:GNG. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 00:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable software. Joe Chill (talk) 17:45, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Well written, but no accompanying news sources make this product non-notable. Minima © (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.