Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweetest High

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. m.o.p 06:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sweetest High[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable release from a notable artist. Per WP:SONGS, a song which has not charted or received official awards and which has not been covered by several otger ntoable artists is not likely to be notable. In this case, there is also a lack of coverage from reliable third party sources. All in all there is a lot of trashy sourcing and speculation. e.g. comments like "from her second album" which are completely unsourced. It also repeats a lot of info already contained on the artist's page. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 23:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I love the song, but I agree with Lil-Unique's opinion. I did an extensive search myself and I found neither chart positions nor enough information to warrant a separate article for this song. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 00:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable. --Cameron Scott (talk) 10:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.