Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Pussy Pauline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:35, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Pussy Pauline[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like the prod removals were vandalism, but erring on the side of AGF, I'll bring it here. No sources, seems obviously unencyclopedic. Only source is unconvincing. Shadowjams (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pending substantiation of notability. --dab (𒁳) 12:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 13:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:Music, WP:Creative and WP:Bio in general. Full disclosure: I was the original PRODer. PDCook (talk) 13:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn bio. ~ DC (Talk|Edits) 15:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.