Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Penny and the Lion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Penny and the Lion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm only seeing one non-trivial source (a brief review here); doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK. This is mostly another platform for the writer and all the references listed pertain to him, and not this book. Enwebb (talk) 01:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added more sources, reviews, and modified/removed author bio section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fizzgig123 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. essentiallyt an advertisement. DGG ( talk ) 05:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although a well set out article (a tad promotional?!!:)), this does not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG, none of the references cited are useable for notability being from amazon, publisher sites and blog types, even the review from Kirkus reviews although being critical of the book, are generally not seen as useable (recent reviews, anyway:)), also doesn't appear to be well known with WorldCat listing just one library, the LOC i suggest the article creator, Fizzgig123, has a read of Wikipedia:Your first article, Wikipedia:Notability (books), and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NBOOK, exactly as set out by Coolabahapple. Title can be added to lists on pages of author and illustrator. E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.