Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swash (brand)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Procter & Gamble brands#Discontinued brands. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Swash (brand)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I deprodded and expanded this article 10 years ago, but in hindsight I don't think the brand meets the notability guideline for organisations, products and services. Few of the sources cited (probably only the Wall Street Journal and Domain Name Wire) satisfy WP:ORGIND; the others are trade publications, articles based on press releases, and the like. As Procter & Gamble used the "Swash" name to sell at least two separate ranges, this is also a borderline WP:FRANKENSTEIN. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Products, and United States of America. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfortunately, not enough notability present as of now. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 22:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Procter & Gamble brands#Discontinued brands. It does seem mention-worthy as a verifiable brand by this company. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:42, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't object to this. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.